Sarcasticseraph
5月,1 2020年4:16 AM

嘿!我认为您可能已经误解了先前的评论。海报的意思只是提供这样的观点,即大多数人对与小说相关的变化持怀疑态度似乎是合理的,这是因为缺乏信息和代表 *需要了解这种变化的存在所需的信息。他们的意思是说,一个人缺乏知识的人的最初观点自然会导致人们认为它是“笨拙者”的想法,这是事实(以及某些声称遭受苦难的人何时遭受苦难的事实他们可能不会特别倾向于虚构的“变化”,因为他们可能会认为“成为”一个钦佩角色的想法是有趣的;不理解有事实的人的现实和其中的创伤。up as characters, and may aspire to be like them. That being said I do believe the ‘factual’ nature of a person’s condition should always be determined by professional diagnosis as well as evidence of substantial qualifying criteria, and not on the form an alter takes). The commenter then goes on to say that, were they to produce a blockbuster movie, they would include a character with DID whose alters were most or all based on cartoon characters, in order to publicly represent and validate the existence and purpose of such alters. The commenter specifies that, were they not able to obtain the rights to use the names of existing cartoon characters in their movie, they would create their own intellectual property in order to preserve the vision of bringing such representation into public view and normalcy. I don’t believe they were trying to invalidate the existence and serious nature of people who suffer from DID that takes such a form, but quite the opposite, and did not intend to imply that any real people were violating copyright law by having a psychological condition that they had no control over the presentation of. Thanks for your time and I hope I could be of help!